From Coase to Collaborative Property Decision-Making: Green Economy Innovation

65 Pages Posted: 25 Nov 2011

See all articles by Elizabeth Burleson

Elizabeth Burleson; London School of Economics (LSE)

Date Written: November 20, 2011


This Article considers the advantages and disadvantages of market-based program design, natural gas regulation, and enhanced international understanding. Transitioning to a green economy involves dedicating efforts towards environmentally sound energy innovation. RGGI, natural gas, and climate change represent sustainability challenges. Optimizing cooperative transboundary green innovation can facilitate inclusive decision-making just as public participation by civil society can help economies transition to environmentally sound energy use. Building upon progress made in the human rights and environment fields can advance both and enhance resilience.

Keywords: Green Economy Innovation, Collaborative Property Decision-Making, RGGI cap & trade, natural gas, fracking, hydraulic fracturing, international law UNFCCC, climate change, sustainable development, environmentally sound energy, public participation, environmental justice Aarhus, human right resilience

JEL Classification: C7, C8, D1, D4, D6, D7, D8, D9, E2, E3, E6, F1, F4, H1, H2, H4, H5, H7, H8, I1, I18, I19, I2I, J1, K

Suggested Citation

Burleson, Elizabeth, From Coase to Collaborative Property Decision-Making: Green Economy Innovation (November 20, 2011). Tulane Journal of Technology & Intellectual Property, Vol. 14, 2011, Available at SSRN:

Elizabeth Burleson (Contact Author) ( email )

London School of Economics (LSE) ( email )

Houghton Street
London, WC2A 2AE
United Kingdom

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics