Libertarianism, Positive Obligations and Property Abandonment: Children’s Rights

International Journal of Social Economics, Vol. 31, No. 3, 2004

14 Pages Posted: 22 Jul 2011

See all articles by Walter E. Block

Walter E. Block

Loyola University New Orleans - Joseph A. Butt, S.J. College of Business

Date Written: July 19, 2011

Abstract

The purpose of the present paper is to test this premise of no positive obligations against a challenging critique that can be made of it. To wit, abandonment of babies. That is, does the mother who abandons her baby haw the positive obligation to at least place it "on the church steps", e.g. notify all other potential care givers of the fact that unless one of them comes forward with a offer to take in the infant, it will die? If so, then there is at least one positive obligation in the libertarian philosophy; if not, then, at least at the outset, the libertarian claim to be generally utilitarian must be greatly attenuated. At best, there would now be an exception to the previously impermeable principle of no positive obligations; at worst, one exception tends to leads another, posing the risk that the premise will be fatally compromised which m undermine the entire philosophical edifice.

Suggested Citation

Block, Walter E., Libertarianism, Positive Obligations and Property Abandonment: Children’s Rights (July 19, 2011). International Journal of Social Economics, Vol. 31, No. 3, 2004. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1889454

Walter E. Block (Contact Author)

Loyola University New Orleans - Joseph A. Butt, S.J. College of Business ( email )

6363 St. Charles Avenue
Box 15, Miller 321
New Orleans, LA 70118
United States
(504) 864-7944 (Phone)
(504) 864-7970 (Fax)

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
58
Abstract Views
477
rank
360,658
PlumX Metrics