The Group Right to Linguistic Security: Whose Rights, What Duties

GROUP RIGHTS, Judith Baker, ed., University of Toronto Press, 1994

Posted: 27 Jul 2011

See all articles by Denise G. Reaume

Denise G. Reaume

University of Toronto - Faculty of Law

Date Written: 1994


Recent debates about the viability of the concept of group rights implicate many important theoretical issues about the nature of rights, of right holders, and of the duties claimed of others. These issues are all important; however, it is difficult to avoid the suspicion that those arguing against group rights are motivated as much by deep political misgivings about the implications of recognizing this type of right as by strictly conceptual misgivings. The concern has to do with the implications for those upon whom duties will be imposed in the name of group rights. The skeptics worry that the rights claimed by groups will severely impair the well-being of individuals. As a practical matter this is a well-founded worry. One need not look far to find examples of group claims which would be seriously detrimental to individuals. However, that unattractive claims have been made merely shows that groups are not immune to power hunger. This has sometimes been used by critics of rights discourse as a reason for abandoning that discourse altogether. But no conceptual tool is incapable of being abused; nor is there any evidence that rights language is more susceptible to abuse than any other way of conceptualizing the moral and political issues at stake.

My central concern is to explore whether any group rights claims are valid and what consequences they have for others, not whether unsupportable claims may or are likely to be made.

This article outlines an account of one group right – the right to linguistic security – and some of its attendant duties in order to explore the cogency of the skeptic's concerns. As preface to this exercise, I outline my account of what it is to have a group right and attempt to clarify some of the issues in the conceptual debate. I conclude by demonstrating that my account of the right to linguistic security illuminates three recent language rights controversies that have come before the Canadian courts.

Keywords: Group Rights, Linguistic Security

Suggested Citation

Reaume, Denise G., The Group Right to Linguistic Security: Whose Rights, What Duties (1994). GROUP RIGHTS, Judith Baker, ed., University of Toronto Press, 1994, Available at SSRN:

Denise G. Reaume (Contact Author)

University of Toronto - Faculty of Law ( email )

78 Queen's Park
Toronto, Ontario M5S 2C5
514-398-6694 (Phone)

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics