American Political Science Review, Volume 107, Issue 01, February 2013, pp 159-187
Posted: 30 Jul 2011 Last revised: 29 Jan 2014
Date Written: September 1, 2012
We study discrimination against immigrants using micro-level data from Switzerland, where, until recently, some municipalities used referendums to decide on the citizenship applications of foreign residents. We show that naturalization decisions vary dramatically with immigrants' attributes, which we collect from official applicant descriptions that voters received before each referendum. Country of origin determines naturalization success more than any other applicant characteristic, including language skills, integration status, and economic credentials. The average proportion of `no' votes is about 40% higher for applicants from the (former) Yugoslavia and Turkey compared to observably similar applicants from richer northern and western European countries. Statistical and taste-based discrimination contribute to varying naturalization success; the rewards for economic credentials are higher for applicants from disadvantaged origins, and origin-based discrimination is much stronger in more xenophobic municipalities. Moreover, discrimination against specific immigrant groups responds dynamically to changes in the groups' relative size.
Keywords: immigration, discrimination, naturalization, natural experiment
JEL Classification: J71, J15, F22
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Hainmueller, Jens and Hangartner, Dominik, Who Gets a Swiss Passport? A Natural Experiment in Immigrant Discrimination (September 1, 2012). American Political Science Review, Volume 107, Issue 01, February 2013, pp 159-187; Formerly: MIT Political Science Department Research Paper . Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1898927 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1898927