Mind the (Mobilization) Gap: Comparing Climate Activism in the United States and European Union

32 Pages Posted: 1 Aug 2011 Last revised: 1 Sep 2011

Date Written: August 12, 2011


The barriers to concerted political action on climate change mitigation are steep, especially in multilevel systems where power is diffused and authority contested. Yet action and mobilization - galvanising resources and people to participate actively - is possible, and in certain instances far reaching. This paper seeks to explain how mobilization occurs in complex multilevel systems. It compares two different polities - the United States and the European Union - to tease out the key features of multilevel systems and how they affect climate activism, mobilization and governance. Focusing particularly on climate activists - politically engaged participants - the paper analyses climate mobilization across three stages: awareness-building, alliance-building and network creation. It argues that successful mobilization is highly contingent on activists’ ability to exploit - or at least navigate - multilevel institutional barriers. To capture this mobilization dynamic, the paper develops the notion of ‘mobilization networks’ - stakeholder networks able to transcend levels and institutional inertia and steer polities towards particular climate goals.

Keywords: climate change, activism, multilevel, mobilization, European Union

Suggested Citation

Bomberg, Elizabeth, Mind the (Mobilization) Gap: Comparing Climate Activism in the United States and European Union (August 12, 2011). APSA 2011 Annual Meeting Paper, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1901194

Elizabeth Bomberg (Contact Author)

University of Edinburgh ( email )

Politics and International Relations
SSPS, George Square
Edinburgh, Scotland EH8 9LD
United Kingdom
(44) + (0)131 6504248 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://www.pol.ed.ac.uk/staff_profiles/bomberg_elizabeth

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics