A Tale of Two Cues: the Impact of Subliminal Versus Implicit Appeals on Racialized Issue Opinions

36 Pages Posted: 1 Aug 2011 Last revised: 25 Aug 2011

See all articles by Carl L. Palmer

Carl L. Palmer

Illinois State University - Department of Politics and Government

Date Written: 2011

Abstract

While the bulk of the implicit priming literature relies on the use of imagery to prime stereotypical considerations (Mendelberg 2001; Valentino, Hutchings, and White 2002), rhetorical cues have also been shown to prime stereotypes subconsciously, either through the use of carefully crafted, racially charged rhetoric (Hurwitz and Peffley 1997, 2005; Peffley, Hurwitz, and Sniderman 1997; White 2007) and experimentally through the use of subliminal cues (Kam 2007; Weinberger and Westen 2008). These priming cues have not however been tested against one another, as a means of determining which has the greatest influence activating stereotypical considerations and subsequently influencing opinion. Using a 2x2, between-subjects design (with control), I test the degree to which varied stereotypical appeals influence opinion on a series of issues. The evidence from two experiments suggests that the effects of racial primes are moderated by both subjects’ accessibility of racial stereotypes as well as their racial background, providing fertile ground for future research in racial priming.

Suggested Citation

Palmer, Carl L., A Tale of Two Cues: the Impact of Subliminal Versus Implicit Appeals on Racialized Issue Opinions (2011). APSA 2011 Annual Meeting Paper, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1902773

Carl L. Palmer (Contact Author)

Illinois State University - Department of Politics and Government ( email )

433 Schroeder Hall
Normal, IL 61790
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
36
Abstract Views
491
PlumX Metrics