Download this Paper Open PDF in Browser

Anti-Bribery Legislation in the United States and United Kingdom: A Comparative Analysis of Scope and Sentencing

40 Pages Posted: 3 Aug 2011 Last revised: 28 Jun 2013

Samer Korkor

Northern District of Ohio; Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP; Washington University in St. Louis - School of Law

Margaret Ryznar

Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law

Date Written: August 4, 2011

Abstract

Lawmakers and prosecutors continue to take aim at a major subset of global corruption - corporate bribery of foreign government officials. Specifically, while the enforcement of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act in the United States has risen to new records, the United Kingdom has revolutionized its anti-bribery law following global criticism of its previously relaxed legal regime. Both U.S. and U.K. anti-bribery laws, furthermore, apply extraterritorially and have the capability to entangle even the largest multinational companies in their legal frameworks. These all-encompassing frameworks hold significant consequences for both corporations and their employees, but the increasing power of anti-bribery law raises important questions regarding the proper scope of legislation on the subject, as well as the sentencing approaches to these crimes.

Suggested Citation

Korkor, Samer and Ryznar, Margaret, Anti-Bribery Legislation in the United States and United Kingdom: A Comparative Analysis of Scope and Sentencing (August 4, 2011). Missouri Law Review, Vol. 76, No. 2, pp. 415-453, 2011. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1903903

Samer Korkor (Contact Author)

Northern District of Ohio ( email )

Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP ( email )

Washington University in St. Louis - School of Law ( email )

Margaret Ryznar

Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law ( email )

530 West New York Street
Indianapolis, IN 46202
United States

Paper statistics

Downloads
307
Rank
82,260
Abstract Views
1,390