Did the SEC Impact Banks’ Loan Loss Reserve Policies and Their Informativeness?
51 Pages Posted: 4 Aug 2011 Last revised: 12 Jul 2013
Date Written: March 3, 2012
Abstract
During the late 1990’s, the SEC alleged that banks were overstating their loan loss allowances to establish cookie jar reserves and issued new guidance on allowance estimation designed to improve financial reporting quality. We show that banks’ estimation methods changed in response to the guidance and the changes significantly affected the informativeness of the allowances as proxied by their ability to explain future losses. While the SEC’s guidance has improved the informativeness of allowances for strong banks, it has had the opposite effect on Weak Banks whose incentives are to understate allowances. Our results help to explain why some (Weak) banks delayed loss recognition during the recent financial crisis.
Keywords: Loan Loss Allowances, Provisions, Bank Accounting, Smoothing, SEC, Regulatory Intervention
JEL Classification: G14, G21, M41
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Marking to Market: Panacea or Pandora's Box?
By Guillaume Plantin, Haresh Sapra, ...
-
Mark-to-Market Accounting and Liquidity Pricing
By Franklin Allen and Elena Carletti
-
The Crisis of Fair Value Accounting: Making Sense of the Recent Debate
By Christian Laux and Christian Leuz
-
Did Fair-Value Accounting Contribute to the Financial Crisis?
By Christian Laux and Christian Leuz
-
Did Fair-Value Accounting Contribute to the Financial Crisis?
By Christian Laux and Christian Leuz
-
By Weitzu Chen, Chi-chun Liu, ...
-
By Chang Joon Song, Wayne B. Thomas, ...
-
Fair Value Accounting and Financial Stability
By Andrea Enria, Lorenzo Cappiello, ...
-
Do Investors Perceive Marking-to-Model as Marking-to-Myth? Early Evidence from FAS 157 Disclosure