Beyond the Resource Curse? Canada and the Case for Bilateral Trade Agreements

IUP Journal of International Relations, Forthcoming

26 Pages Posted: 4 Aug 2011 Last revised: 14 Oct 2014

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: August 3, 2011


This article examines the case for Canadian trade bilateralism through the lens of the resource curse. As a favoured federal policy option for economic diversification, Canada’s bilateral trade agreements have underperformed even as energy exports continue to rise. Given Canada’s structural relationship to the global economy and the very low levels of diversification created by preferential trade agreements outside the NAFTA arrangement, there are few strong arguments for an intensification of Canadian bilateralism. However, the political reasons for bilateral trade agreements are better than the economic ones. Even though Canada's pattern of bilateral trade agreements to date does not suggest a coordinated attempt to unlock a specific region or strategic set of trading partners, a political stake in the current system pays dividends both in terms of diplomatic legitimacy as well as in the development of new templates for future agreements.

Suggested Citation

Froese, Marc D., Beyond the Resource Curse? Canada and the Case for Bilateral Trade Agreements (August 3, 2011). IUP Journal of International Relations, Forthcoming, Available at SSRN: or

Marc D. Froese (Contact Author)

Burman University ( email )

6730 University Drive
Lacombe, Alberta T4L 2E5

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics