Download this Paper Open PDF in Browser

Torts and Other Wrongs

31 Pages Posted: 9 Aug 2011 Last revised: 16 May 2012

John Gardner

University of Oxford - Faculty of Law

Date Written: August 4, 2011

Abstract

In this paper, a draft contribution to a symposium on the work of John Goldberg and Ben Zipursky, I take Goldberg and Zipursky to task for failing to distinguish the law of torts adequately from some neighbouring areas of private law. I focus on their equivocation on the question of whether reparative (a.k.a. compensatory) damages have a special place in the law of torts. I suggest that this equivocation is bound up with Goldberg's and Zipursky's wish to maintain what I argue to be an artificial rivalry between their 'civil recourse' explanation of tort law and the 'corrective justice' explanations associated with Weinrib, Coleman, and others. I suggest that 'civil recourse' and 'corrective justice' each capture part of the truth about tort law. I end by addressing briefly some doubts about whether this is a truth worth capturing.

Keywords: Torts, John Goldberg, Benjamin Zipursky, civil recourse, corrective justice, damages, remedies

Suggested Citation

Gardner, John, Torts and Other Wrongs (August 4, 2011). Oxford Legal Studies Research Paper No. 46/2011. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1904834 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1904834

John Gardner (Contact Author)

University of Oxford - Faculty of Law ( email )

St. Cross Building
St. Cross Road
Oxford, OX1 3UJ
United Kingdom

Paper statistics

Downloads
648
Rank
32,445
Abstract Views
2,983