Hermeneutic Concepts and Immodest Conceptual Analysis of the Law

24 Pages Posted: 6 Aug 2011

Date Written: August 5, 2011

Abstract

Brian Leiter holds that traditional intuition-guided conceptual analysis (CAL) of the law either modestly but relatively uninterestingly make claims about our shared understanding of the law, or it immodestly but unwarrantedly make claims about the law itself. Here, I defend and explore the implications of a third possibility. Namely, CAL is simultaneously an analysis of our shared understanding of the law and of the law itself, for our concept of law constitutes the reality of law. Hence, law immodestly and warrantedly makes claims about the nature of law. The inspiration for this thesis is Locke’s notions of an archetype idea and maker’s knowledge. Thus, I refer to the thesis I defend here as the Lockean approach.

Suggested Citation

Sciaraffa, Stefan, Hermeneutic Concepts and Immodest Conceptual Analysis of the Law (August 5, 2011). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1905836 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1905836

Stefan Sciaraffa (Contact Author)

McMaster University ( email )

1280 Main Street West
Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4M4
Canada

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
144
Abstract Views
802
Rank
384,741
PlumX Metrics