Emerging Constitutional Threats to Food Labeling Reform

Pamela A. Vesilind

University of Arkansas School of Law; Vermont Law School

April 12, 2012

NeXuS: Chapman Journal of Law & Policy, Forthcoming
Vermont Law School Research Paper No. 11-20

Much has been written about the American consumer’s untapped power to compel agriculture reform. Food safety and animal welfare advocates urge us to “vote with our wallets” to influence food production practices. This sounds good, but the federal food labeling regulatory scheme has left us frustratingly under-informed. State labeling laws and citizen consumer fraud suits have been thwarted by two powerful doctrinal weapons, federal preemption and free expression protection of commercial speech.

Under the Roberts Court’s expansion of corporate personhood, these doctrines have been reshaped and reapplied. One consequence is diminished state police power authority in the name of consumer protection; another consequence is a limitation on consumer tort litigation. Parts I and II introduce the relevant food labeling regulations and traditional doctrinal analyses in consumer protection conflicts. Using recent Supreme Court cases AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion, Wyeth v. Bruesewitz, PLIVA v. Mensing, National Meat Association v. Harris, and Milavetz, Gallop & Milavetz v. United States, Part III suggests that these doctrines are becoming more obstructive to food labeling reform. The conclusion suggests that Milavetz’s approach to compelled commercial speech is an outlier, ensuring that the compelled speech doctrine will remain fertile ground for labeling litigation.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 24

Keywords: food law, labeling, advertising, agriculture, animal welfare, animal law, pre-emption, commercial speech

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: August 10, 2011 ; Last revised: March 11, 2014

Suggested Citation

Vesilind, Pamela A., Emerging Constitutional Threats to Food Labeling Reform (April 12, 2012). NeXuS: Chapman Journal of Law & Policy, Forthcoming ; Vermont Law School Research Paper No. 11-20. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1907396

Contact Information

Pamela A. Vesilind (Contact Author)
University of Arkansas School of Law ( email )
312 Waterman Hall
Fayetteville, AR AR 72701
United States
9199495884 (Phone)

Vermont Law School ( email )
68 Windsor Street
P.O. Box 60
South Royalton, VT 05068
United States

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 510
Downloads: 102
Download Rank: 199,924