The Safety Net: Applying Coram Nobis Law to Prevent the Execution of the Innocent

26 Pages Posted: 11 Aug 2011

See all articles by Steven J. Mulroy

Steven J. Mulroy

University of Memphis - Cecil C. Humphreys School of Law

Date Written: August 10, 2011

Abstract

The article argues that there is a crisis of erroneous capital sentencing and that the insufficiency of alternative remedies makes the common law writ of “coram nobis” an overlooked and effective legal procedure when arguably exculpatory evidence is discovered after trial. It reviews the history and current use of coram nobis, both nationwide and particularly in Tennessee. Tennessee is a useful case study because it has the highest percentage of death penalty sentences reversed due to serious error. The article asserts as a legal standard for relief a finding of “reasonable probability” that the newly discovered evidence would have changed the initial trial outcome. It compares this approach to the approach taken in some other states and in the federal system, and raises policy concerns arguing for the “reasonable probability” approach.

Suggested Citation

Mulroy, Steven J., The Safety Net: Applying Coram Nobis Law to Prevent the Execution of the Innocent (August 10, 2011). Virginia Journal of Social Policy and the Law, Vol. 11, No. 1, 2003; University of Memphis Legal Studies Research Paper No. 108. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1907910

Steven J. Mulroy (Contact Author)

University of Memphis - Cecil C. Humphreys School of Law ( email )

One North Front Street
Memphis, TN 38103-2189
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
54
rank
368,357
Abstract Views
482
PlumX Metrics