References (46)



Reasoning from Paradigms and Negative Evidence

Fabrizio Macagno

Universidade Nova de Lisboa

Douglas Walton


August 11, 2011

Pragmatics & Cognition, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 92–116, 2011

Reasoning from negative evidence takes place where an expected outcome is tested for, and when it is not found, a conclusion is drawn based on the significance of the failure to find it. By using Gricean maxims and implicatures, we show how a set of alternatives, which we call a paradigm, provides the deep inferential structure on which reasoning from lack of evidence is based. We show that the strength of reasoning from negative evidence depends on how the arguer defines his conclusion and what he considers to be in the paradigm of negated alternatives. If we negate only two of the several possible alternatives, even if they are the most probable, the conclusion will be weak. However, if we deny all possible alternatives, the reasoning will be strong, and even in some cases deductively valid.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 21

Keywords: argumentation, argument from ignorance, burden of proof, classification under lack of knowledge, defeasible reasoning, Gricean maxims, lack of evidence, negation, scalar predicates

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: August 11, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Macagno, Fabrizio and Walton, Douglas, Reasoning from Paradigms and Negative Evidence (August 11, 2011). Pragmatics & Cognition, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 92–116, 2011. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1908052

Contact Information

Fabrizio Macagno (Contact Author)
Universidade Nova de Lisboa ( email )
Av. Berna 26 I&D Building, office 4.02
Lisbon, 1069-061
HOME PAGE: http://fabriziomacagno.altervista.org/
Douglas Walton
Independent ( email )
No Address Available
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 448
Downloads: 61
Download Rank: 244,607
References:  46
People who downloaded this paper also downloaded:
1. Webs of Things in the Mind: A New Science of Evidence
By Peter Tillers