25 Pages Posted: 18 Aug 2011 Last revised: 14 Nov 2016
Date Written: August 17, 2011
Is it possible to have a partnership consisting of one person, a partner without a partner? The question will arise when all but one of the members leaves a partnership. The Revised Uniform Partnership Act (RUPA) attempts to give greater stability to partnerships by narrowing the circumstances under which dissolutions occur, but it also fails to address the fundamental and important question of whether a partnership may be continued by a sole surviving partner.
In this article, we explore the issues raised by a single person partnership. In particular, we address the central issue of whether the departure of the penultimate partner from a term partnership triggers a winding up of the business or whether the statutory buyout is called into play. We have structured much of the discussion as a dialog between the authors. This allows us both to focus on the precise issues under RUPA presented by a single person partnership and to probe the competing arguments on whether such a partnership may exist. Although we have differing views on whether a single person partnership is possible under RUPA, we conclude on common ground that the buyout is appropriate. We also unite in a call for statutory clarification.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Hillman, Robert W. and Weidner, Donald J., Partners Without Partners: The Legal Status of Single Person Partnerships (August 17, 2011). Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law, Vol. 17, p. 451 (2012); FSU College of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 527. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1911501