International Commercial Arbitration and the Application of Mandatory Rules of Law

Asian International Law Journal, Vol. 5, No. 1, 2009

Faculty of Law, Monash University Research Paper No 2010/49

47 Pages Posted: 19 Aug 2011

Date Written: 2009

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to try and synthesize the views that have been put forward to date and analyze them in a comprehensive framework. The article begins with an analysis of:

(1) the concept of mandatory rules; (2) the position of the debate within international commercial arbitration; (3) the sometimes overlooked distinction between issues of jurisdiction and the application of mandatory rules; (4) legal and policy arguments for the application of mandatory rules; and (5) the relevance of party autonomy and possible types of evidence of consent for or against the application of mandatory rules.

This leads on to a critical analysis of the suggestions postulated by leading authors, organisations and treaties, and finally, an evaluation of the various individual factors that may come into play if an arbitrator is found to have a discretion as to whether to apply mandatory rules in the absence of express consent from the parties.

Keywords: international commercial arbitration, mandatory rules, jurisdiction, party autonomy, consent, evidence, treaties, discretion

JEL Classification: K10, K19, K20, K29, K30, K33, K39, K00

Suggested Citation

Waincymer, Jeffrey Maurice, International Commercial Arbitration and the Application of Mandatory Rules of Law (2009). Asian International Law Journal, Vol. 5, No. 1, 2009. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1912318 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1912318

Jeffrey Maurice Waincymer (Contact Author)

Monash University - Faculty of Law ( email )

Wellington Road
Clayton, Victoria 3800
Australia

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
580
Abstract Views
2,400
rank
45,291
PlumX Metrics