Justice in Jeopardy: Accountability for the Darfur Atrocities

18 Pages Posted: 21 Aug 2011

See all articles by Zachary D. Kaufman

Zachary D. Kaufman

University of Florida Levin College of Law; Boston University - School of Law; Washington University in St. Louis - School of Law; University of Houston Law Center; Stanford Law School; Yale University - Law School; Harvard University - Harvard Kennedy School (HKS)

Date Written: 2006


This article, published in Criminal Law Forum, considers accountability for atrocities perpetrated in the Darfur region of Sudan. This article documents and assesses the controversy, compromise, and, ultimately, consensus within the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) that resulted in the UNSC’s decision on March 31, 2005, to adopt Resolution 1593, referring the situation in Darfur since July 1, 2002, to the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court (ICC). This article first considers why the United States government initially proposed the establishment of an alternative transitional justice option for addressing Darfur, in the form of an ad hoc hybrid tribunal to be established in Arusha, Tanzania, that would be jointly administered by the United Nations (UN) and the African Union and act as an extension of the UN International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda. Second, given its opposition to the ICC, the article examines why the United States government ultimately abstained from voting on, rather than exercise its veto against, UNSC Resolution 1593, thus enabling the Darfur situation to be referred to the ICC. Third, the article asks whether the advent of the ICC and the UNSC’s referral of the Darfur situation necessarily preclude the pursuit of other transitional justice options in this case. Finally, the article questions the significance of the UNSC referral of the Darfur situation to the ICC, and the political and legal precedents this referral may set.

Keywords: Transitional Justice, Accountability, Deterrence, Darfur, Sudan, Rwanda, Arusha, Tanzania, Africa, Iraq, United States, U.S. foreign policy, Genocide, Atrocities, War Crimes Tribunals, ICC, ICTR, ICTY, United Nations Security Council, International Law, International Criminal Law

Suggested Citation

Kaufman, Zachary D., Justice in Jeopardy: Accountability for the Darfur Atrocities (2006). Criminal Law Forum, Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 343-360, 2006, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1912945

Zachary D. Kaufman (Contact Author)

University of Florida Levin College of Law ( email )

P.O. Box 117625
Gainesville, FL 32611-7625
United States

HOME PAGE: http://https://www.law.ufl.edu/faculty/zachary-d-kaufman

Boston University - School of Law ( email )

765 Commonwealth Avenue
Boston, MA 02215
United States

Washington University in St. Louis - School of Law ( email )

Campus Box 1120
St. Louis, MO 63130
United States

HOME PAGE: http://law.wustl.edu/faculty-staff-directory/profile/zachary-d-kaufman/

University of Houston Law Center ( email )

4104 Martin Luther King Boulevard
Houston, TX 77204-6060
United States

HOME PAGE: http://www.law.uh.edu/faculty/zacharykaufman/

Stanford Law School ( email )

559 Nathan Abbott Way
Stanford, CA 94305-8610
United States

Yale University - Law School ( email )

P.O. Box 208215
New Haven, CT 06520-8215
United States

Harvard University - Harvard Kennedy School (HKS) ( email )

79 John F. Kennedy Street
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics