Corporations’ Right to Sue for Defamation: An Australian Perspective

Entertainment Law Review, Vol. 22, pp. 195-200, 2011

Sydney Law School Research Paper No. 11/51

17 Pages Posted: 22 Aug 2011

See all articles by David Rolph

David Rolph

The University of Sydney - Faculty of Law

Abstract

As the United Kingdom undergoes defamation law reform, it might be useful to consider recent Australian developments. Across Australia, since 2006, corporations have had the right to sue for defamation severely curtailed. After five years of operation, it is possible to make an assessment of the advantages and disadvantages of this reform. This article analyses recent cases in which corporations have been forced to rely on alternative causes of action, which previously would have been dealt with as defamation claims. It argues that the reform is sound as a matter of principle and policy but that the particular form of the legislative provision requires refinement. In addition, this article points out that there have been unintended and undesirable consequences to this reform.

Keywords: tort, defamation, media law, corporations, standing to sue, Australia, United Kingdom, law reform, national uniform defamation laws, misleading or deceptive conduct, breach of confidence, injurious falsehood, injunctions

JEL Classification: K10, K13, K30

Suggested Citation

Rolph, David, Corporations’ Right to Sue for Defamation: An Australian Perspective. Entertainment Law Review, Vol. 22, pp. 195-200, 2011, Sydney Law School Research Paper No. 11/51, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1914129

David Rolph (Contact Author)

The University of Sydney - Faculty of Law ( email )

New Law Building, F10
The University of Sydney
Sydney, NSW 2006
Australia

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
644
Abstract Views
2,971
Rank
82,964
PlumX Metrics