28 Pages Posted: 22 Aug 2011 Last revised: 6 Dec 2012
Date Written: November 2012
Rules excluding various kinds of evidence from criminal trials play a prominent role in criminal procedure and have generated considerable controversy. In this paper we address the general topic of excluding factually relevant evidence, that is, the kind of evidence that would rationally influence the jury’s verdict if it were admitted. We do not offer a comprehensive analysis of these exclusionary rules but add to the existing literature by identifying a new domain for economic analysis, focusing on how juries respond to the existence of such a rule. We show that the impact of exclusionary rules on the likelihood of conviction is complex and depends on the degree of rationality exhibited by juries and on the motivations of the prosecutor.
Keywords: Exclusionary rules, evidence, juries
JEL Classification: K40
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Dharmapala, Dhammika and Garoupa, Nuno M. and McAdams, Richard H., Do Exclusionary Rules Convict the Innocent? (November 2012). U of Chicago Law & Economics, Olin Working Paper No. 569; Illinois Program in Law, Behavior and Social Science Paper No. LBSS11-30; Illinois Public Law Research Paper No. 11-11. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1914453 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1914453