Baffled by Inactivity: The Individual Mandate and the Commerce Power

53 Pages Posted: 25 Aug 2011

See all articles by John T. Valauri

John T. Valauri

Northern Kentucky University - Salmon P. Chase College of Law

Date Written: August 24, 2011

Abstract

Is there a way to analyze and evaluate the unprecedented individual mandate, consistent with the text of the Constitution and (at least post-1937) relevant Supreme Court decisions, without relying on the novel activity/inactivity distinction advanced by its opponents (to the bafflement of many courts and commentators)? This article argues that there is. It presents a brief against the mandate based upon the original public meaning and doctrinal exposition of words and phrases such as “commerce,” “regulate,” “necessary and proper,” and even “among,” which are in the Constitution and the cases. In doing this, it resists expansive readings of these terms which would give Congress virtually unlimited power in favor of an understanding more consistent with the principles of limited government and enumerated powers.

Keywords: Constitution, commerce, necessary and proper, individual mandate, original public meaning

JEL Classification: K10, K19

Suggested Citation

Valauri, John T., Baffled by Inactivity: The Individual Mandate and the Commerce Power (August 24, 2011). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1916303 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1916303

John T. Valauri (Contact Author)

Northern Kentucky University - Salmon P. Chase College of Law ( email )

Nunn Hall
Highland Heights, KY 41099
United States
859-572-5387 (Phone)

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
83
rank
288,407
Abstract Views
474
PlumX Metrics