IP Misuse and Innovation Harm

Iowa Law Review Bulletin, Vol. 52, No. 96, 2011

Minnesota Legal Studies Research Paper No. 11-30

10 Pages Posted: 26 Aug 2011

See all articles by Thomas F. Cotter

Thomas F. Cotter

University of Minnesota Law School

Date Written: August 26, 2011

Abstract

"This essay, a short response to Christina Bohannan’s important recent article, IP Misuse as Foreclosure, 96 Iowa Law Review 475 (2011), expresses agreement with Professor Bohannan’s conclusions that merely equating misuse with certain violations of substantive antitrust law is probably unwise; that the “beyond the scope” rationale nevertheless is vague; and that misuse doctrine might provide a useful tool for penalizing assertions of IP rights (principally copyright rights) that would foreclose access to the public domain and thus impinge upon free speech. The essay nevertheless expresses caution over Professor Bohannan’s call for courts to apply misuse doctrine to combat harms to competition and innovation - what I refer to in the essay as “innovation harm” - in a manner that would depart from standard antitrust law, at least to the extent that she contemplates fairly widespread use of the doctrine in this fashion"

Keywords: patents, misuse, antitrust, innovation, copyright

Suggested Citation

Cotter, Thomas F., IP Misuse and Innovation Harm (August 26, 2011). Iowa Law Review Bulletin, Vol. 52, No. 96, 2011; Minnesota Legal Studies Research Paper No. 11-30. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1917604 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1917604

Thomas F. Cotter (Contact Author)

University of Minnesota Law School ( email )

229 19th Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55455
United States
612-624-7527 (Phone)

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
112
Abstract Views
1,000
rank
244,928
PlumX Metrics