Download this Paper Open PDF in Browser

The Elusive Goal of Impartiality

Iowa Law Review, Vol. 97, No. 1, 2011

Southwestern Law School Working Paper No. 1131

34 Pages Posted: 30 Aug 2011 Last revised: 3 May 2015

Debra Lyn Bassett

Southwestern Law School

Rex Perschbacher

University of California, Davis - School of Law

Date Written: August 29, 2011

Abstract

Over the past ten years, the topic of judicial recusal has received increased attention in virtually every quarter – in the media, in the legal commentary, and even in Congress. The reason for this surge in interest is not due to recent changes in the applicable recusal standards or enhanced investigative reporting, but rather largely appears to be the result of inadequate attention to – or perhaps in some cases, arrogance or callous disregard for – the recusal standards, exacerbated by procedural deficiencies that prevent the recusal rules from being fully effective. This Article seeks to identify the flaws with the current approach to judicial recusal, and then offers a four-step proposal for restoring faith in the judiciary.

Keywords: judicial recusal, judicial disqualification, legal ethics

Suggested Citation

Bassett, Debra Lyn and Perschbacher, Rex, The Elusive Goal of Impartiality (August 29, 2011). Southwestern Law School Working Paper No. 1131. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1919252

Debra Bassett (Contact Author)

Southwestern Law School ( email )

3050 Wilshire Blvd.
Los Angeles, CA 90010
United States

Rex Perschbacher

University of California, Davis - School of Law ( email )

Martin Luther King, Jr. Hall
Davis, CA CA 95616-5201
United States

Paper statistics

Downloads
64
Rank
298,268
Abstract Views
627