Download this Paper Open PDF in Browser

Alternative Justifications for Academic Support II: How ‘Academic Support Across the Curriculum’ Helps Meet the Goals of the Carnegie Report and Best Practices

61 Pages Posted: 30 Aug 2011 Last revised: 31 Dec 2012

Louis N. Schulze Jr.

Florida International University (FIU) - College of Law

Date Written: August 29, 2011

Abstract

In the wake of two momentous critiques of legal education, popularly known as the “Carnegie Report” and “Best Practices,” law schools are reconsidering certain basic assumptions about how we educate future lawyers. Even the most forward-thinking reformers, however, struggle with the details of how to implement many of the recommendations of those reports. Providing more formative assessment, for instance, is a laudable objective but one that has serious ramifications in terms of resource expenditures. This article seeks to provide a remedy for many of these struggles: “Academic Support Across the Curriculum.” This piece argues that the reconceptualization of an under-leveraged asset in many law schools, Academic Support Programs (ASPs), can help provide crucial improvements in legal education. By examining the reforms urged by the Carnegie Report and Best Practices, and by detailing the methods of certain exemplary ASPs throughout the country, this piece analyzes how ASPs just might be the answer to many tough questions.

Suggested Citation

Schulze, Louis N., Alternative Justifications for Academic Support II: How ‘Academic Support Across the Curriculum’ Helps Meet the Goals of the Carnegie Report and Best Practices (August 29, 2011). Capital University Law Review, Vol. 40, 2011. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1919258

Louis Schulze Jr. (Contact Author)

Florida International University (FIU) - College of Law ( email )

11200 SW 8th St.
RDB Hall 1097
Miami, FL 33199
United States
305-348-4963 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://law.fiu.edu/faculty/louis-schulze-jr/

Paper statistics

Downloads
276
Rank
92,627
Abstract Views
1,268