Dimensionality, Issue Attention, and Agenda Dynamics: The Case of Federal Urban Policy
36 Pages Posted: 30 Aug 2011
Date Written: August 1, 2011
Abstract
Does the stable, low-dimensional environment that scholars detect in analyses of congressional and mass behavior structure policy debate over a particular set of issues? Through analysis of an original data set of 6,560 congressional hearings held from 1946 to 2004, we map the underlying dimensional structure of congressional attention to a range of urban policy issues including housing, development, crime, and transit. First, we employ an innovative measurement model to demonstrate that the urban agenda space is neither one dimensional, nor stable through time. Second, we show that this dimensional structure is related to changes in issue attention, leading to sweeping issue realignments in the composition of the federal urban policy agenda. These changes are consistent with the shifting partisan and structural features of American politics. In all, our findings have far-reaching implications for issue politics at the federal level and for structuring agenda setting activities of political actors, including city governments themselves.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
By James J. Heckman and James M. Snyder
-
The Hunt for Party Discipline in Congress
By Nolan Mccarty, Keith T. Poole, ...
-
By Keith T. Poole and Howard Rosenthal
-
On Measuring Partisanship in Roll Call Voting: The U.S. House of Representatives, 1877-1999
By Gary W. Cox and Keith T. Poole
-
The Geometry of Multidimensional Quadratic Utility in Models of Parliamentary Roll Call Voting
-
Agenda Power in the Japanese House of Representatives
By Gary W. Cox, Mikitaka Masuyama, ...
-
Congressional Party Defection in American History
By Timothy P. Nokken and Keith T. Poole