The Adjudication of Historical Evidence: A Comment and and Elaboration on a Proposal by Justice Lebel

University of New Brunswick Law Journal, Vol. 60, p. 146, 2006

28 Pages Posted: 4 Sep 2011 Last revised: 26 Nov 2012

See all articles by Shin Imai

Shin Imai

York University - Osgoode Hall Law School

Date Written: 2006

Abstract

The appropriate forum and procedures for deciding whether Aboriginal and treaty rights exists has been troubling for courts. In the early years after the enactment of section 35, and today, in a significant number of cases, the issue was decided in criminal proceedings. Often charges were laid for hunting or fishing without a license, or out of season. Such was the case in R. v. Marshall and R. v. Bernard when the Supreme Court of Canada was required to consider an appeal of a conviction for a provincial offence related to logging. Justice LeBel mused about the appropriateness of criminal proceedings to determine matters that had wide spread consequences on people who were not parties to the proceedings. This article looks at the alternative of using civil proceedings to address these matters, and tentatively concludes that it would be feasible if supports, such as adequate funding, were put in place. However, the article raises a larger concern with the approach the Supreme Court of Canada takes on history. In this case, and in others, the Court is attempting to read history in order to make a determination on the contemporary balance between Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal access to resources. This approach necessarily distorts history and sometimes results in puzzling conclusions. The article ends by contemplating a future process that could give full recognition to historical realities in order to inform contemporary rights.

Keywords: Aboriginal, R. v. Bernard, R. v, Marshall, Indian, Aboriginal logging, Canadian Indian, LeBel, negotiation and consultation, access to justice

JEL Classification: K11, K22, K33, K32, F54, L72, L78, M14, N56, Q34

Suggested Citation

Imai, Shin, The Adjudication of Historical Evidence: A Comment and and Elaboration on a Proposal by Justice Lebel (2006). University of New Brunswick Law Journal, Vol. 60, p. 146, 2006. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1921797

Shin Imai (Contact Author)

York University - Osgoode Hall Law School ( email )

4700 Keele Street
Toronto, Ontario M3J 1P3
Canada

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
28
Abstract Views
464
PlumX Metrics