Valuing Nature: Economic Value, Conservation Values and Sustainable Development
25 Pages Posted: 9 Sep 2011
Date Written: October 21, 2001
Were Member States ‘entitled or obliged’ to take into account various non-environmental requirements in drawing up the initial list of sites eligible to be Sites of Community Importance under the EC Habitats Directive? In particular, was the UK Secretary of State correct to think that the Severn Estuary, an area including Atlantic salt meadows and inter-tidal mudflats, was a possible site for inclusion on the list? Or could or should he have had regard to economic and social factors, in light of the location of Bristol Port, the UK’s fastest growing port and the foremost distributor of cars in the UK? This analysis considers Case C-371/98, The Queen v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions, ex parte First Corporate Shipping Ltd, interveners: World Wide Fund for Nature UK (WWF) and Avon Wildlife Trust  ECR-I 9235 which considered this issue, and argues that non-environmental considerations need to be excluded from the site selection process.
Keywords: EC environmental law, habitat conservation, Directive 92/43/EEC, site selection, limits of Member States’ discretion, economic and social considerations
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation