Safer Ratios, Riskier Portfolios: Banks’ Response to Government Aid
87 Pages Posted: 12 Sep 2011 Last revised: 27 May 2014
Date Written: February 19, 2014
Abstract
Using novel data on bank applications to the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP), we study the effect of government assistance on bank risk taking. Bailed-out banks initiate riskier loans and shift assets toward riskier securities after government support. However, this shift in risk occurs mostly within the same asset class and, therefore, remains undetected by regulatory capital ratios, which indicate improved capitalization at bailed-out banks. Consequently, these banks appear safer according to regulatory ratios, but show an increase in volatility and default risk. These findings are robust to controlling for credit demand and account for selection of TARP recipients by exploiting banks’ geography-based political connections as an instrument for bailout approvals.
Keywords: bailout, TARP, risk, lending, financial crisis, moral hazard, banking
JEL Classification: E51, G01, G21, G28
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Bank Risk Taking and Competition Revisited
By John H. Boyd and Gianni De Nicolo
-
Liberalization, Moral Hazard in Banking and Prudential Regulation: Are Capital Requirements Enough?
-
Competition and Financial Stability
By Franklin Allen and Douglas M. Gale
-
Capital Requirements, Market Power and Risk-Taking in Banking
-
Size, Charter Value and Risk in Banking: An International Perspective
-
Competition and Stability: What's Special About Banking?
By Elena Carletti and Philipp Hartmann
-
Bank Risk-Taking and Competition Revisited: New Theory and New Evidence
By John H. Boyd, Gianni De Nicolo, ...
-
By Thorsten Beck, Asli Demirgüç-kunt, ...
-
By Thorsten Beck, Asli Demirgüç-kunt, ...