Download this Paper Open PDF in Browser

Visual Invention

46 Pages Posted: 12 Sep 2011 Last revised: 17 Jul 2015

Sarah Burstein

The University of Oklahoma College of Law

Date Written: April 9, 2012

Abstract

Recently, there has been a renewed interest in design patents and, in particular, in the issue of nonobviousness. Courts and commentators have long struggled with how the nonobviousness requirement should be applied to designs. This Article argues that the Federal Circuit’s current test for design patent nonobviousness is flawed and proposes several changes to that test. The approach proposed here will provide much-needed clarity in an unusually murky area of law and will also better promote the relevant policy goals.

Keywords: Intellectual property, design patents, industrial design

Suggested Citation

Burstein, Sarah, Visual Invention (April 9, 2012). 16 Lewis & Clark L. Rev. 169 (2012). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1926162

Sarah Burstein (Contact Author)

The University of Oklahoma College of Law ( email )

300 Timberdell Road
Norman, OK 73019
United States

HOME PAGE: http://www.law.ou.edu/content/burstein-sarah

Paper statistics

Downloads
263
Rank
97,784
Abstract Views
3,623