The Enforcement of the European Arrest Warrant: A Comparison between Spain and the UK

European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice, pp. 263-307, 2007

45 Pages Posted: 12 Sep 2011

See all articles by Mar Jimeno-Bulnes

Mar Jimeno-Bulnes

Universidad de Burgos; IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law; The University of New South Wales

Date Written: July 1, 2007

Abstract

If there is a ‘star’ rule on judicial cooperation in criminal matters, it is the Council Framework Decision of 13 June 2002 on the European Arrest Warrant and the Surrender Procedures between Member States (EAW). Its popularity has increased following the deplorable attacks in the United States of America on 11 September 2001, because it is seen as an effective mechanism in the fight against international terrorism. The Council Framework Decision was presented exactly 8 days after the 9/11 attacks5 and agreement was reached by Member States in their political negotiations after a mere three months. It also constitutes ‘the first concrete measure’ adopted on the basis of mutual recognition of judicial decisions, a principle established in October 1999 by the Tampere Council as ‘the cornerstone of judicial cooperation in the Union.’ The same principle is also recognized by the European Constitution and was recently reinforced by the European Council in the Hague Programme (2005). It is foreseen in the explanatory memorandum that the EAW will replace the current system of extradition between Member States – the Convention – which has neither been widely ratified nor particularly successful.

The Council Framework Decision is intended as a juridical instrument in the field of judicial cooperation on criminal matters, and similar to the Directives, should be implemented in the national law of each member state, in this case prior to 31 December 2003. Spain promptly adapted the new rule in the form of Law3/2003 14 March, on the European Arrest Warrant and Surrender (LOEDE). The UK has also met its obligations in good time by approving the Extradition Act 2003 (EA), on the 20 November, which has been in force since 1 January 2004. This comparative study sets out the special regulation of the ‘Euro-warrant,’ making particular reference to procedural aspects contained in Spanish and UK legislation. It makes specific reference to the competent judicial authorities that are authorised to issue and execute EAWs, to the development of judicial proceedings concerning the issue and execution of this instrument and, in addition, to the growing number of bibliographical sources and judicial experience on the practical application of these new rules.

Keywords: European judicial cooperation in criminal matters, European Arrest Warrant, Extradition, Spain, UK

Suggested Citation

Jimeno-Bulnes, Mar, The Enforcement of the European Arrest Warrant: A Comparison between Spain and the UK (July 1, 2007). European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice, pp. 263-307, 2007, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1926277

Mar Jimeno-Bulnes (Contact Author)

Universidad de Burgos ( email )

Hospital del Rey s/n
Burgos, Burgos 09001
Spain
34-947-258735 (Phone)
34-947-258702 (Fax)

HOME PAGE: http:// https://investigacion.ubu.es/investigadores/35275/detalle

IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law ( email )

565 W. Adams St.
Chicago, IL 60661-3691
United States
312.906.5254 (Phone)
312.906.5280 (Fax)

HOME PAGE: http://www.kentlaw.edu

The University of New South Wales ( email )

High Street
Kensington
Sidney, 2052
Australia

HOME PAGE: http://https://www.law.unsw.edu.au/

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
129
Abstract Views
857
Rank
349,746
PlumX Metrics