The Illusory Right to Counsel

Eve Brensike Primus

University of Michigan Law School

August 1, 2011

Ohio North University Law Review, Vol. 37, pp. 595-618, 2011

No symposium designed to address crises in the legal profession would be complete without a discussion of our systematic failure to provide competent legal representation to criminal defendants. In these symposium remarks, I analyze each stage of the criminal process from the trial to direct appeal, through the state post-conviction process, and into federal habeas corpus proceedings and explain how, at each stage, criminal defendants routinely face the threat of incarceration (or continued incarceration) without the aid of competent counsel. In addition to failing to provide effective representation, I demonstrate how the criminal justice system essentially prevents defendants from ever being able to challenge their counsels’ ineffective performance, thus rendering the right to effective counsel a right without a remedy. Finally, I offer some possible suggestions for ways to reform the criminal justice system so as to restore meaning to the fundamental right to counsel.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 24

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: September 14, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Primus, Eve Brensike, The Illusory Right to Counsel (August 1, 2011). Ohio North University Law Review, Vol. 37, pp. 595-618, 2011. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1927274

Contact Information

Eve Brensike Primus (Contact Author)
University of Michigan Law School ( email )
625 South State Street
Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1215
United States

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 437
Downloads: 87
Download Rank: 232,328