Comment: Sit-Ins and State Action - Mr. Justice Douglas, Concurring

16 Pages Posted: 15 Sep 2011 Last revised: 30 Dec 2014

See all articles by William W. Van Alstyne

William W. Van Alstyne

Duke University School of Law; William & Mary Law School

Kenneth L. Karst

University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - School of Law

Date Written: 1962

Abstract

This analysis of Mr. Justice Douglas’ concurrence in Garner v. Louisiana pays special attention to the lip service Justice Douglas pays to the state action requirement while never fully addressing such an issue.

Keywords: state action

Suggested Citation

Van Alstyne, William W. and Van Alstyne, William W. and Karst, Kenneth L., Comment: Sit-Ins and State Action - Mr. Justice Douglas, Concurring (1962). Stanford Law Review, Vol. 14, p. 762, 1962, William & Mary Law School Research Paper No. 09-125, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1927496

William W. Van Alstyne (Contact Author)

Duke University School of Law ( email )

210 Science Drive
Box 90362
Durham, NC 27708
United States

William & Mary Law School ( email )

South Henry Street
P.O. Box 8795
Williamsburg, VA 23187-8795
United States

Kenneth L. Karst

University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - School of Law ( email )

385 Charles E. Young Dr. East
Room 1242
Los Angeles, CA 90095-1476
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
23
Abstract Views
647
PlumX Metrics