Presidential Approval Models Revisited: A New Perspective
23 Pages Posted: 16 Sep 2011 Last revised: 5 Jul 2017
Date Written: September 15, 2011
Abstract
Use of quarterly economic data in presidential job approval models implies that polls are reactions, in part, to quarterly economic performance. Perhaps this implication is not intended but it is due to the availability of low frequency economic data. We argue that voters have a shorter reaction time and do not wait for periodic data while the economy is in motion. We suggest the use of high frequency financial variables that proxy past, present and expected economic performance. Since opinions are formed based on continuous information, we also suggest employing Geweke type instantaneous feedback as well as traditional Granger type sequential causal feedback. The results show that for presidential candidates, weekly financial risk may be just as important as quarterly GDP growth or monthly unemployment.
Keywords: Presidential job approval, economic performance, financial markets, financial risk, instantaneous feedback
JEL Classification: D72, P16
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you want regular updates from SSRN on Twitter?
Recommended Papers
-
Conditional Volatility, Skewness and Kurtosis: Existence and Persistence
By Michael Rockinger and Eric Jondeau
-
Conditional Volatility, Skewness, and Kurtosis: Existence and Persistence
By Eric Jondeau and Michael Rockinger
-
Is Gold a Hedge or a Safe Haven? an Analysis of Stocks, Bonds and Gold
By Dirk G. Baur and Brian M. Lucey
-
Y2k Fears and Safe Haven Trading of the U.S. Dollar
By Aditya Kaul and Stephen G. Sapp
-
Psychological Barriers in Gold Prices?
By Raj Aggarwal and Brian M. Lucey
-
Price Clustering and Natural Resistance Points in the Dutch Stock Market: A Natural Experiment
-
Flights and Contagion - an Empirical Analysis of Stock-Bond Correlations
By Dirk G. Baur and Brian M. Lucey