Abstract

https://ssrn.com/abstract=1929512
 


 



In Praise of Contextuality - Justice O'Connor and the Establishment Clause


Marie A. Failinger


Mitchell Hamline School of Law

January 1, 2006

Hamline Law Review, Vol. 29, No. 1, p. 7, 2006

Abstract:     
Among Justice Sandra Day O’Connor’s lasting contributions to Supreme Court Jurisprudence has been her attempt to contextualize Religion Clause jurisprudence, to move the Court in the direction of considering the circumstances surrounding government in assessing its constitutionality. Typical of this contributor has been her two decades of work in Establishment Clause law, in particular, ended by Lynch v. Donnelly, in which she introduced the “non-endorsement” test and one of the Ten Commandment cases, McCreary County, Kentucky v. American Civil Liberties Union, in which it was most recently employed. The non-endorsement test has served as one of the two commonly competing tests in establishment cases not involving financial aid. This article argues that her attempt to push the Court towards contextualism, in Establishment Clause cases in particular, has been an important correction to the Court's approach.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 10

Keywords: Justice Sandra Day O’Connor, Religion Clause, Establishment Clause, non-endorsement test, contextualism, Lynch v. Donnelly, McCreary County, Kentucky v. American Civil Liberties Union


Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: November 5, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Failinger, Marie A., In Praise of Contextuality - Justice O'Connor and the Establishment Clause (January 1, 2006). Hamline Law Review, Vol. 29, No. 1, p. 7, 2006. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1929512

Contact Information

Marie A. Failinger (Contact Author)
Mitchell Hamline School of Law ( email )
875 Summit Ave
St. Paul, MN 55105-3076
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 406
Downloads: 11