Not Mere Rhetoric: On Wasting or Claiming Your Legacy, Justice Scalia

84 Pages Posted: 5 Nov 2011  

Marie A. Failinger

Mitchell Hamline School of Law

Date Written: January 1, 2003

Abstract

The thesis of the article is that the Court’s enterprise is centered on preserving community through an ethics of warranted trust, and that Scalia’s rhetoric often rejects such an ethic. A modern democratic citizen, along with his whole community, instead finds himself in the situation of necessary trust in democratic institutions like the Supreme Court. The willingness of a political community ultimately to place its trust in authority is partially dependent on that authority’s commitment to, and skill at, creating a convincing argument. The practice of rhetoric recognizes the dynamics of a relation of trust: the rhetor must put his or her own character up for judgment, he or she must create a situation of warranted trust by doing the homework on the matter at hand which Aristotle labeled invention, and he or she must demonstrate respect for the personhood—sacredness, if you will—of those who constitute his audiences by paying attention to who they are and what matters to them.

Keywords: Justice Scalia, Supreme Court Justices, rhetoric

Suggested Citation

Failinger, Marie A., Not Mere Rhetoric: On Wasting or Claiming Your Legacy, Justice Scalia (January 1, 2003). University of Toledo Law Review, Vol. 34, p. 425, 2003. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1929569

Marie A. Failinger (Contact Author)

Mitchell Hamline School of Law ( email )

875 Summit Ave
St. Paul, MN 55105-3076
United States

Paper statistics

Downloads
26
Abstract Views
408