Reply to Martha Nussbaum and Ian Hacking

6 Pages Posted: 14 Oct 2011

See all articles by Edward Stein

Edward Stein

Yeshiva University - Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law

Date Written: 2002

Abstract

The author responds to Nussbaum’s (21(3) Law & Phil. 317-334) and Hacking’s (id. at 335-347) discussions of his book, The Mismeasure of Desire: The Science, Theory, and Ethics of Sexual Orientation (1999). Among other points, he addresses whether sexual orientations are natural human kinds, clarifying his position that there is no connection between that question and the legal and ethical issues about homosexuality. In addition, he assesses Nussbaum’s proposal for a sophisticated version of the “born that way” argument and sets forth some better possible arguments for gay and lesbian rights, suggesting a fusion of privacy and equality-based arguments.

Suggested Citation

Stein, Edward, Reply to Martha Nussbaum and Ian Hacking (2002). Law and Philosophy, Vol. 21, pp. 349-353, 2002, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1930578

Edward Stein (Contact Author)

Yeshiva University - Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law ( email )

55 Fifth Ave.
New York, NY 10003
United States
212-790-0269 (Phone)
212-790-0205 (Fax)

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
107
Abstract Views
762
Rank
430,301
PlumX Metrics