Serving the Common Interest in U.S. Forest Policy: A Case Study of the Healthy Forests Restoration Act

Environmental Management, Vol. 43, pp. 396-410, 2009

15 Pages Posted: 21 Sep 2011

Date Written: September 20, 2009

Abstract

In the United States, the common interest often is conceived as a by-product of the pluralist, interest group driven democratic process. Special interests dominate in many political arenas. Consequently, we have lost the language, vocabulary, and ability to talk about the common interest. The way to reverse this trend is to develop and practice with new tools that allow us to articulate what we mean by the common interest in specific contexts. In this article, we leveraged the literature on procedural, substantive and pragmatic decision making to illustrate how they work together to demonstrate whether and how the common interest was served in three case studies of Healthy Forests Restoration Act implementation on the Apache-Sitgreaves National Forest in Arizona. In two of the cases we found that the common interest was mostly served, while in the third case it was not. Our results raise questions about the ability of procedural criteria or substantive criteria alone to determine effectiveness in decision making. When evaluated together they provide a more complete understanding of how the common interest is or is not served.

Keywords: democracy, forests, common interest, procedural justice, decision making, Healthy Forests Restoration Act, Arizona, wildfire, forest policy, National Environmental Policy Act

Suggested Citation

Steelman, Toddi A., Serving the Common Interest in U.S. Forest Policy: A Case Study of the Healthy Forests Restoration Act (September 20, 2009). Environmental Management, Vol. 43, pp. 396-410, 2009 . Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1931043 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1931043

Toddi A. Steelman (Contact Author)

University of Saskatchewan ( email )

School of Environment and Sustainability
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 5A7
Canada

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
29
Abstract Views
244
PlumX Metrics