Notes on a Bicentennial Constitution: Part II, Antinomial Choices and the Role of the Supreme Court
20 Pages Posted: 21 Sep 2011 Last revised: 30 Dec 2014
Date Written: 1987
Continuing the examination of judicial review conducted around the Constitution’s bicentennial, this article lays bare the inconsistencies in the expected tasks of the Supreme Court. Where some roles of the Court have traditionally been treated as indivisible, examining those same roles separate from one another produces an incoherent view of the Court that is difficult to compromise.
Keywords: federalism, judicial review
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation