Universal Human Rigths as a Shared Political Identity: Impossible? Necessary? Sufficient?

Metaphilosophy, Vol. 1, pp. 65-67, 2009

GLOBAL DEMOCRACY AND EXCLUSION, pp. 161-176, R. Tinnevelt, H. De Schutter, eds., Whiley-Blackwell, 2010

23 Pages Posted: 28 Sep 2011

Date Written: September 28, 2011

Abstract

Would a global commitment to international human rights norms provide enough of a sense of community to sustain a legitimate and sufficiently democratic global order? Skeptics worry that human rights cannot help maintain the mutual trust among citizens required for a legitimate political order, since such rights are now too broadly shared. Thus prominent contributors to democratic theory insist that the members of the citizenry must share some features unique to them, to the exclusion of others — be it a European identity (Habermas and Derrida 2003) or a national public culture generally shared only by the members (Miller 1995, 2000). This essay considers and rejects these arguments. While stable, democratic redistributive arrangements do require trust and institutionalised means of trustworthiness; they need not rely on norms or values that distinguish members from non-members: such exclusion is not required. Thus human rights may be part of a common political identity.

Keywords: David Miller, democracy, exclusion, human rights, Jürgen Habermas, political identity, trust

Suggested Citation

Follesdal, Andreas, Universal Human Rigths as a Shared Political Identity: Impossible? Necessary? Sufficient? (September 28, 2011). Metaphilosophy, Vol. 1, pp. 65-67, 2009; GLOBAL DEMOCRACY AND EXCLUSION, pp. 161-176, R. Tinnevelt, H. De Schutter, eds., Whiley-Blackwell, 2010. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1934845

Andreas Follesdal (Contact Author)

Pluricourts ( email )

P.O. Box 6706
St. Olavs plass 5
0130 Oslo
Norway

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
27
Abstract Views
286
PlumX Metrics