Normative Justifications for Lax (or No) Corporate Fiduciary Duties: A Tale of Problematic Principles, Imagined Facts and Inefficient Outcomes
Rutheford B. Campbell Jr.
University of Kentucky - College of Law
September 26, 2011
Kentucky Law Journal, Vol. 99, p. 231, 2010-2011
Corporate fiduciary duty standards are at an all time low.
Normative justifications offered to support lax corporate fiduciary duty standards, however, are weak. The justifications fail adequately to provide a persuasive reason for abandoning the economic principle widely applied in society, which is to hold actors accountable for the economic loss caused by their actions. Such accountability is thought to provide an incentive for efficient conduct.
This paper offers a critical analysis of two arguments for allowing corporate managers to act without accountability for the full economic loss caused by their mismanagement. The two arguments have been largely unchallenged and today garner broad support from influential quarters.
One argument is that corporate managers should not be accountable for a lack of due care in their decisions, and the justification for this position is a claim that eliminating the duty of care obligation provides an incentive for managers to take value creating risks on behalf of the company and its shareholders. The second argument is that corporate managers should be free to allocate and re-allocate unlimited amounts of corporate wealth among various corporate stakeholders, and this position is justified by a claim that such a rule provides an incentive for the investment of efficient levels of firm specific capital by the corporate stakeholders who provide monetary and human capital to corporations.
The normative justifications offered in support of these arguments depend on multiple, essential factual assumptions that not only are unproven empirically but also are counterintuitive and seem to get only more factually improbable when unpacked and analyzed closely. In short, these factual assumptions – which heretofore appear largely to have been accepted without question or analysis – amount to a thin reed and do not meet the burden that should be required of those who propose abandoning or broadly limiting corporate managerial accountability.
A strong version of corporate fiduciary duties provides an economic incentive for efficient and fair outcomes.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 28
Keywords: corporate fiduciary duty, corporation, fiduciary duty, critical analysis, lack of due care, allocate, re-allocate, corporate stakeholders
JEL Classification: K2, K20
Date posted: November 28, 2011