Will International Trade Law Promote or Inhibit Global Artificial Photosynthesis?
Asian Journal of WTO and International Health Law and Policy (AJWH), Vol. 6, pp. 313-347, 2011
35 Pages Posted: 30 Sep 2011
Date Written: September 30, 2011
Artificial photosynthesis (AP) is an area of well-advanced research involving large international groups at the cutting edge of synthetic biology and nanotechnology. In simple terms it offers to produce a cheap source of hydrogen for fuel through using sunlight to split water, as well as making basic starches by a process involving absorption of carbon dioxide via the enzyme RuBisCO. As the proliferating numbers of university-based research teams working in this area begin to combine, there will be a natural escalation of the expected time for a global roll-out of AP domestic and international devices. Policy attention will then turn to whether international governance systems (particularly international trade law) will assist or hinder this process. The stakes are high – global AP offers a solution not only to human energy, food and water needs (burning hydrogen fuel creates pure water) but to the rising atmospheric carbon dioxide levels linked to climate change problems. This paper begins to examine how governments seeking to promote and subsidize AP products may interact with international trade and investment law. It involves analysis in this context of WTO multilaterals and U.S. bilaterals in relation to intellectual monopoly privileges (IMPs), 'Doha-minus' provisions, definitions of technological 'innovation', non-violation nullification of benefits requirements, textual inhibitions on science-based cost-effectiveness assessment of new technologies, as well as investor-state dispute settlement provisions.
Keywords: artificial photosynthesis, intellectual monopoly privilege, patents, non-violation nullification of benefits, investor-state dispute settlement, TRIPs, WTO, cost-effectiveness, synthetic biology, renewable energy, solar power, innovation
JEL Classification: E61, FO1, FO2, F11, F17, F13, L98, F21, F35, F97, H41, K32, L94, K33
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Register to save articles to
By Marlynn Wei
Three Proposals for Rewarding Novel Health Technologies Benefiting People Living in Poverty: A Comparative Analysis of Prize Funds, Health Impact Funds and a Cost-Effectiveness/Competitive Tender Treaty