Abstract

https://ssrn.com/abstract=1937285
 


 



Resolving the Paradox of the Innocent Construction Rule


David Allen Larson


Mitchell | Hamline School of Law

January 1, 1984

American Journl of Trial Advocacy, Vol. 7, p. 481, 1984

Abstract:     
The application of the innocent construction rule in defamation cases has led to illogical and questionable holdings. This article will explain the nature of that rule and illustrate its use by focusing on cases arising in Illinois. It will review the recent case of Chapski v. Copley Press, where the Illinois Supreme Court rejected the innocent construction rule, and raise the possibility that additional reform may be necessary in Illinois. Finally, other jurisdictions relying upon similar rules of interpretation will be identified and discussed.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 11

Keywords: Defamation, Illinois, innocent construction rule


Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: February 17, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Larson, David Allen, Resolving the Paradox of the Innocent Construction Rule (January 1, 1984). American Journl of Trial Advocacy, Vol. 7, p. 481, 1984. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1937285

Contact Information

David Allen Larson (Contact Author)
Mitchell | Hamline School of Law ( email )
875 Summit Avenue
Saint Paul, MN 55105
United States
651-290-6388 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://mitchellhamline.edu/biographies/person/david-larson/
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 514
Downloads: 31