The Technology of Birth: Is it Worth it?
53 Pages Posted: 10 Feb 2000 Last revised: 13 Mar 2022
Date Written: October 1999
Abstract
We evaluate the costs and benefits of increased medical spending for low birth weight infants. Lifetime spending on low birth weight babies increased by roughly $40,000 per birth between 1950 and 1990. The health improvements resulting from this have been substantial. Infant mortality rates fell by 72 percent over this time period, largely due to improved care for premature births. Considering both length and quality of life, we estimate the rate of return for care of low birth weight infants at over 500 percent. Although prenatal care and influenza shots are more cost effective than neonatal care, this is significantly more cost effective than other recent innovations such as coronary artery bypass surgery, treatment of severe hypertension, or routine pap smears for women aged 20-74. We conclude that the answer to the question posed in this paper is a resounding 'Yes'.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
By David M. Cutler, Angus Deaton, ...
-
Understanding the Twentieth Century Decline in Chronic Conditions Among Older Men
-
The Costs and Benefits of Intensive Treatment for Cardiovascular Disease
By David M. Cutler, Mark B. Mcclellan, ...
-
Your Money and Your Life: The Value of Health and What Affects it
-
Changes in the Age Distribution of Mortality Over the 20th Century
By David M. Cutler and Ellen Meara
-
By Marc T. Law and Sukkoo Kim
-
The Measure of Man and Older Age Mortality: Evidence from the Gould Sample
-
Understanding Mid-Life and Older Age Mortality Declines: Evidence from Union Army Veterans
-
Fiscal Shenanigans, Targeted Federal Health Care Funds, and Patient Mortality
By Katherine Baicker and Douglas Staiger
-
The Poor at Birth: Infant Auxology and Mortality at Philadelphia's Almshouse Hospital, 1848-1873
By Claudia Goldin and Robert A. Margo