Cognition, Vol. 121, p. 154, 2011
8 Pages Posted: 4 Oct 2011
Date Written: July 16, 2011
Researchers have recently argued that utilitarianism is the appropriate framework by which to evaluate moral judgment, and that individuals who endorse non-utilitarian solutions to moral dilemmas (involving active vs. passive harm) are committing an error. We report a study in which participants responded to a battery of personality assessments and a set of dilemmas that pit utilitarian and non-utilitarian options against each other. Participants who indicated greater endorsement of utilitarian solutions had higher scores on measures of Psychopathy, machiavellianism, and life meaninglessness. These results question the widely-used methods by which lay moral judgments are evaluated, as these approaches lead to the counterintuitive conclusion that those individuals who are least prone to moral errors also possess a set of psychological characteristics that many would consider prototypically immoral.
Keywords: Morality, Judgment, Decision making, Psychopathy, Values, Ethics, Intuition, Utilitarianism, Machiavellianism, Emotions, Reasoning, Moral rules, No Meaning, Moral dilemmas
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Bartels, Daniel M. and Pizarro, David A., The Mismeasure of Morals: Antisocial Personality Traits Predict Utilitarian Responses to Moral Dilemmas (July 16, 2011). Cognition, Vol. 121, p. 154, 2011; Columbia Business School Research Paper No. 11-10. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1937818