Delaware’s Relevance in Chapter 22: Who is ‘Courting Failure’ Now?

23 Pages Posted: 5 Oct 2011

Date Written: May 4, 2011

Abstract

This study presents surprising new statistical evidence that contributes to the current “over-heated” academic debate about the Delaware courts’ role in Chapter 11 failure. In 2001, Professor LoPucki published an influential article suggesting that when large corporations file for bankruptcy under Chapter 11, they fail at a dramatically higher rate in Delaware courts than in other jurisdictions. He attributed this to corruption. His article enraged many academics and practitioners, and ignited many articles in the past two decades. This study presents startling evidence that while Chapter 11s filed in Delaware courts did have much higher failure rates from 1991-1996, after 1996, the failure rates for Delaware-cases and non-Delaware cases have been converging. In fact, in very recent years, failure rates have been approximately the same for Delaware cases and non-Delaware cases. While this study suggests that the debate about Delaware’s relevance is now obsolete, it also offers important insight into Professor LoPucki’s theory, as well as his critics’ arguments.

Keywords: Chapter 22, Chapter 11, Bankruptcy Law, Courting Failure, Delaware, Reorganization

JEL Classification: K20

Suggested Citation

Lee, Ruth Sarah, Delaware’s Relevance in Chapter 22: Who is ‘Courting Failure’ Now? (May 4, 2011). Review of Banking and Financial Law, Forthcoming, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1938814

Ruth Sarah Lee (Contact Author)

Harvard Law School ( email )

1563 Massachusetts Ave
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
206
Abstract Views
578
rank
185,300
PlumX Metrics