Health: A Fundamental Liberty Based on an Internationally Recognized Human Right with Domestic Civil Rights Implications

The Journal of Race, Gender, and Poverty, pp. 1-29, 2009

29 Pages Posted: 15 Oct 2011

See all articles by Brenda Reddix-Smalls

Brenda Reddix-Smalls

North Carolina Central University (NCCU) - School of Law

Date Written: January 15, 2009

Abstract

The question posed to policy makers is: whether universal health care is a right or a privilege. The answer can be articulated as an affirmative rejection of the theory that health care is a right. First, health is an internationally recognized human right, and second, health should be considered a fundamental domestic liberty. Like travel, marriage, and voting rights enunciated by the United States Supreme Court from a contextual interpretation of the United States Constitution, health is a fundamental liberty based on an inherent human right. Health care, however, is a mixed public good. When subjected to an equal protection analysis, health care raises serious civil rights implications for the distribution of this good in the United States.

Keywords: Universal Health Care, Constittutional Law, Equal Protection, Fundamental Liberties

Suggested Citation

Reddix-Smalls, Brenda, Health: A Fundamental Liberty Based on an Internationally Recognized Human Right with Domestic Civil Rights Implications (January 15, 2009). The Journal of Race, Gender, and Poverty, pp. 1-29, 2009, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1944312

Brenda Reddix-Smalls (Contact Author)

North Carolina Central University (NCCU) - School of Law ( email )

1512 S. Alston Ave.
Durham, NC 27707
United States

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
29
Abstract Views
561
PlumX Metrics