Is Public R&D a Complement or Substitute for Private R&D? A Review of the Econometric Evidence
72 Pages Posted: 20 Mar 2000 Last revised: 26 Aug 2022
Date Written: October 1999
Abstract
Is public R&D spending complementary and thus "additional" to private R&D spending, or does it substitute for and tend to "crowd out" private R&D? Conflicting answers are given to this question. We survey the body of available economectric evidence accumulated over the past 35 years. A framework for analysis of the problem i is developed to help organize and summarize the findings of econometric studies based on time series and cross-section data from various levels of aggregation (laboratory, firm, industry, country). The findings overall are ambivalent and the existing literature as as a whole is subject to the criticim that the nature of the "experiment(s)" that the investigators envisage is not adequately specified. We conclude by offering suggestions for improving future empirical research on this issue.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
The Impact of Corporate Restructuring on Industrial Research and Development
-
How Effective are Fiscal Incentives for R&D? a New Review of the Evidence
By Bronwyn H. Hall and John Van Reenen
-
An Empirical Evaluation of the Effects of R&D Subsidies
By Isabel Busom
-
Does Government R&D Policy Mainly Benefit Scientists and Engineers?
-
Do R&D Subsidies Stimulate or Displace Private R&D? Evidence from Israel
By Saul Lach
-
Public R&D Policies and Cost Behavior of the Us Manufacturing Industries