36 Pages Posted: 24 Oct 2011 Last revised: 1 Sep 2015
Date Written: July 18, 2012
Although there is an extensive literature on domestic legal transplants, far less is known about the transplantation of supranational judicial bodies. The Andean Tribunal of Justice (ATJ) is one of nearly a dozen copies of the European Court of Justice (ECJ), and the third most active international court. This article considers the origins and evolution of the ATJ as a transplanted judicial institution. It first reviews the literatures on legal transplants, neofunctionalist theory, and the spread of European ideas and institutions, explaining how the intersection of these literatures informs the study of supranational judicial transplants. The article next explains why the Andean Pact’s member states decided to add a court to their regional integration initiative, why they adapted the European Community model, and how the ECJ’s existence has shaped the evolution of Andean legal doctrine and the political space within which the ATJ operates. We conclude by analyzing how the ATJ’s experience informs the study of supranational transplants and theories of supranational legal integration more generally.
Keywords: European community, Andean community, international courts and tribunals, European Court of Justice, Andean tribunal of justice, regional integration, legal transplants, neofunctionalist theory, ideational diffusion
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Alter, Karen J. and Helfer, Laurence R. and Saldías, Osvaldo, Transplanting the European Court of Justice: The Experience of the Andean Tribunal of Justice (July 18, 2012). American Journal of Comparative Law, Vol. 60(3), p.629 (2012); Oñati Socio-Legal Series, Vol. 1, No. 4, 2011. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1948405