The Effect of Family Ownership on Different Dimensions of Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from Large US Firms
Business Strategy and the Environment, Vol. 23, No. 7, pp. 475-492, 2014
36 Pages Posted: 24 Oct 2011 Last revised: 28 Jun 2015
Date Written: October 24, 2011
Abstract
Prior research has shown that family firms differ from non-family firms with regard to aggregate measures of corporate social responsibility (CSR). We argue that CSR is a multidimensional concept that comprises several aspects, which range from employee relations to ecological concerns and product issues. Based on an organizational and family identity perspective, we argue that the effect of family ownership can differ across various CSR dimensions. Family firms can be responsible and irresponsible regarding CSR at the same time. We use a dataset of large US firms to test our hypotheses. Our Bayesian regressions show that family ownership is negatively associated with community-related CSR performance and positively associated with diversity-, employee-, environment-, and product-related aspects of CSR. The largest positive effect of family ownership on CSR performance exists with regard to product-related aspects of CSR.
Keywords: Family firms, corporate social responsibility, CSR
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Family Management, Family Ownership, and Downsizing: Evidence from S&P 500 Firms
-
R&D Investments in Family and Founder Firms: An Agency Perspective
-
How to Pay Non-Family Managers in Large Family Firms: A Principal-Agent Model
-
Corporate Social Responsibility of Large Family and Founder Firms
By Jorn H. Block and Marcus Wagner
-
Corporate Social Responsibility in Large Family and Founder Firms
By Jorn H. Block and Marcus Wagner
-
Family Firm Density and Regional Innovation Output: An Exploratory Analysis
By Jorn H. Block and Frank Spiegel
-
By Frank Spiegel and Jorn H. Block