Interpretative Bills of Rights and the Mystery of the Unwritten Constitution

23 Pages Posted: 25 Oct 2011 Last revised: 6 Dec 2011

See all articles by Mark Elliott

Mark Elliott

University of Cambridge - Faculty of Law

Date Written: October 25, 2011

Abstract

The British and New Zealand constitutions have much in common, including their approach to the protection of fundamental rights. The novel, interpretative approach reflected in the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 was an important influence on those who drafted the United Kingdom’s Human Rights Act 1998. However, substantial similarities notwithstanding, the New Zealand and United Kingdom Acts differ in significant respects — not only textually, but also in their judicial application and wider reception by politicians and the public. This article considers the extent of (and reasons for) the similarities and differences between the two systems, against the background of the debate presently being conducted in the United Kingdom about whether its Human Rights Act should be replaced by a new 'UK Bill of Rights'. It will be argued that, ultimately, that which distinguishes the two systems is less significant than that which unites them — and that their respective models of human rights protection are both functions of, and are sustained by, the unwritten form of constitutionalism that is common to New Zealand and Britain.

Keywords: constitution, constitutional law, bill of rights, human rights, parliamentary sovereignty, human rights act 1998, New Zealand bill of rights act

JEL Classification: K10, K19, K30, K39

Suggested Citation

Elliott, Mark C., Interpretative Bills of Rights and the Mystery of the Unwritten Constitution (October 25, 2011). University of Cambridge Faculty of Law Research Paper No. 51/2011 . Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1949035

Mark C. Elliott (Contact Author)

University of Cambridge - Faculty of Law ( email )

10 West Road
Cambridge, CB3 9DZ
United Kingdom

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
504
Abstract Views
2,329
rank
55,254
PlumX Metrics