Disabled and Disserved: The Right to Counsel for Mentally Disabled Aliens in Removal Proceedings

52 Pages Posted: 2 Nov 2011 Last revised: 5 Feb 2012

Date Written: November 1, 2011

Abstract

In May 2011, in Matter of M-A-M, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) for the first time examined the issue of mentally disabled aliens and their vulnerability in immigration proceedings. To assist Immigration Judges (IJs), the BIA created a framework to analyze cases where issues of mental competency are raised. While this decision appears to recognize the unjust plight of mentally disabled respondents in removal proceedings, it is wholly insufficient in providing meaningful due process protection to aliens with mental disabilities. Given the complexities of immigration law and the profound impact that legal representation can have on an alien, those with mental disabilities cannot be expected to properly defend themselves against removal without legal representation.

Keywords: immigration, right to counsel, mental disability

Suggested Citation

Kaplan, Aliza B., Disabled and Disserved: The Right to Counsel for Mentally Disabled Aliens in Removal Proceedings (November 1, 2011). Georgetown Immigration Law Review, Forthcoming; Lewis & Clark Law School Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2012-2. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1952885 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1952885

Aliza B. Kaplan (Contact Author)

Lewis & Clark Law School ( email )

10015 S.W. Terwilliger Blvd.
Portland, OR 97219
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
108
rank
239,433
Abstract Views
811
PlumX Metrics